100 Days

As you have probably noticed, the Council is running a "100 Days" campaign to clean up the local environment. Whilst few would argue that litter-free streets and dog poo-free parks are more pleasant and healthier, some are questionning whether the Council is going too far and whether there are other reasons behind the clean up.

An un-named group has put up stickers (see above) created a spoof website (http://www.100days.org.uk) that claims the Council's campaign's "overarching theme this year will be making more money for us - your Council and our favourite corporate partners. While at the same time having a jolly good bash at dirty homeless people, bored teengagers, graffiti artists and in fact anyone on the streets who might damage our attempts to sell more real estate to developers of luxury flats. That's right, once again it's time to ignore the real issues affecting the residents of this city (like record levels of car pollution and the increasing gap between rich and poor) and instead focus on things that curtain-twitching potential Labour voters worry themselves about, like dog shit and other people who don't look like them. And if that's not enough, in 2005 we'll also be picking on charity soup kitchens, closing down market traders and much, much more!"

A fair point you might think - after all, air pollution will kill many more than discarded gum wrappers ever will - but how did the Council react? According to the Manchester Evening News, Cllr Paul Murphy, the council's Direct Services boss called the group cowardly and anarchic, promising to prosecute anyone caught putting up the organisation's posters. He said: "What people have got to understand is that we are attempting to clean up Manchester to a world class city standard. If people feel that agenda threatens liberty or we are being killjoys then I disagree profoundly. These people are environmental terrorists and we would be ankle deep in litter if it were left to them."

Yes, you read it right. The council are calling the protestors behind the web site "terrorists" and failing to answer the main point raised by the web site which question's the council's priorities. Oh, and if you were planning on having one of the most natural of gardens, a wildflower one where you do little if any maintanence, then be warned. This year the council is also focussing on fining those with overgrown gardens.

Related Articles


Networking Newsletter #61 (April 2005) Contents Page Home     STOP PRESS     Latest newsletter
Events listing     Campaign contacts
Resources    Network for Success
Subscribe now!     Search this site

© Networking Newsletter (Spring 2005)